**Quantitative Comparisons**. Each question shows two columns, A and B, each describing some quantity, but the same four choices are always the same:

**A.**The quantity in Column A is greater.

**B.**The quantity in Column B is greater.

**C.**The two quantities are equal.

**D.**The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.

These questions can be devilishly tricky (particularly when the answer is

**D**). Consider this classic example:

`x`> 0

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

2x | (2x)^{2} |

Many students will only consider integer values of

`x`and choose

**B**as their answer, which is incorrect. What if

`x`is ¼? Then the value of Column A is ½ and the value of Column B is ¼, so Column A is greater! But if

`x`is any value larger than ½, then Column B will be greater. This means the correct answer must be

**D**. (I deliberately chose 2

`x`instead of

`x`to eliminate the case where trying

`x`=1 makes the two columns equal and trying any

`x`>1 makes Column B greater, which makes it easier to come up with

**D**as the right answer.)

So that is a quantitative comparison question. Like many upper-middle-class kids from the northeast, I took the SATs for the first time in the 7th grade to try to get into CTY. I didn't know what CTY was at the time, but my mother did, and fortunately for me, she recognized what a tremendous opportunity it would be for me to go. Mom bought me my first copies of

*10 SATs*and

*Cracking the SAT*that year. (I say "first copies" because I had to buy new ones the following year when they re-centered the scoring and changed the test.) The SAT became my new challenge, and I've been kinda obsessed with the thing ever since.

Which is why while pondering the most efficient route on my walk to work, which involves walking around an arc (a rarity in New York City), I have developed the following Quantitative Comparison question:

CE and BD are 90° arcs on circles which are concentric at point A. Segment AC is greater than segment AB.

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

The length of arc CE. | The length of arc BD plus the length of segment DE. |

And also the following quantitative comparison question for the same diagram:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

The length of arc CE. | The length of segment CB plus length of arc BD plus the length of segment DE. |

I'll write a follow-up post with the answers in a couple of days. I know I found the result surprising (and now I know the best way to walk to work)!

Sweet! Nice blast from the past! There's no need to use derivatives but I thought it could be fun:

ReplyDeletePart I:

d(BD+DE)/d(DE)

= d(BD)/d(DE) + d(DE)/d(DE)

= d(pi/2*(EA-DE))/d(DE) + 1

= 0 - pi/2 + 1

< 0

Part II:

d(CB+BD+DE)/d(DE)

= d(CB)/d(DE) + d(BD+DE)/d(DE)

= 1 + 1 - pi/2

> 0

Column A: Your math SAT score in 7th grade.

ReplyDeleteColumn B: Your math SAT score in 12th grade.

Results for me were surprising (well, surprising to me in 12th grade).

Thank you for sharing such a brilliant article.

ReplyDeleteทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

that’s awesome.

ReplyDeleteทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

it’s so amazing.

ReplyDeleteทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

ทางเข้าbiobet

I do accept as true with all the concepts you’ve offered

ReplyDeleteon your post. They are very convincing and can definitely work.

Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for starters. May just you please lengthen them a bit from next time?

섯다

I got too much interesting stuff on your blog. I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the good work.

ReplyDelete스포츠토토

I every time used to read post in news papers but

ReplyDeletenow as I am a user of internet therefore from now I am using net for

content, thanks to web.

일본야동

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info.

ReplyDelete토토사이트

I would like to show thanks to you just for rescuing me from this particular matter. Just after checking throughout the the web and getting notions that were not powerful. Feel free to visit my website; 야설

ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work , I read few blog posts on this website and I believe that your weblog is rattling interesting. Thank you for this effort, I will give you 5 stars for this. Kindly check the link below Thank you! Feel free to visit my website; 일본야동

ReplyDeleteYour style is so unique compared to many other people. Thank you for publishing when you have the opportunity,Guess I will just make this bookmarked. Feel free to visit my website; 국산야동

ReplyDeleteIt is very rare these days to find sites that provide information someone is watching for. I am glad to see that your site share valued information that can help to many readers. nice one and keep writing! Feel free to visit my website;

ReplyDelete일본야동

I enjoy kinds very own post. It will be respectable to get a single narrative inside and outside of the core of this distinctive core specialized niche will likely be commonly knowledgeable. Feel free to visit my website;

ReplyDelete한국야동

Extremely decent blog and articles. I am realy extremely glad to visit your blog. Presently I am discovered which I really need. I check your blog regular and attempt to take in something from your blog. Much obliged to you and sitting tight for your new post.메이저사이트모음

ReplyDelete